Climate Revisionism 101 : “We Have To Get Rid Of The Medieval Warm Period”
Posted: March 18, 2018 Filed under: Climate Fraud, Climate History, Climatism, Data Tampering, Fact Check, Govt Climate Agenda, Medieval Warm Period, Michael Mann, Pseudo-Science | Tags: Climate Change, climate fraud, climate optimum, Climate science, Data Fraud, Data Tampering, Dr David Deming, Global Warming, Hockey Stick, IPCC, Medieval Warm Period, Michael Mann, Scientific Fraud, Temperature Data Fraud, UN, UN IPCC, US Senate, US Senate Testimony 4 Comments
https://www.epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=266543
WHEN you are a man-made global warming alarmist prosecuting your case as “unprecedented”, you need to make sure that no recent climate era was as warm or warmer than the present, even if that means having to rewrite the past to fit your theory.
THE Medieval Warm Period, also known as the Medieval Climate Optimum (for obvious reasons) existed a short time ago in the climate record, from c. 950 to c. 1250., and has remained a thorn in the side for modern “global warming” catastrophists…
Why John Christy’s Missing Hotspot Matters
Posted: April 5, 2017 Filed under: Climate science, Empirical Evidence, Fact Check, Hot Spot | Tags: AGW falsified, Climate Change, Climate Congressional Enquiry, Climate science, Global Warming, John Christy, Satellite Data, science, Scientific Method, The Hot Spot, The Missing Hot Spot, US Senate Testimony 1 Comment“One of the key predicted observations of anthropogenic CO2 climate theory is the existence of an equatorial tropospheric hotspot.
“But nobody has yet managed to unequivocally detect that predicted hotspot.”
IMO, one of the most important pieces of the “global warming” aka “climate change” aka “climate disruption” debate … the missing ‘Hot-Spot’.
Dr David Evans wrote an excellent piece on the missing “hot spot” back in 2008:
“No Smoking Hot Spot”
(The Australian)https://climatism.wordpress.com/2014/01/28/the-missing-hot-spot/
—–
“No amount of experimentation can ever prove me right; a single experiment can prove me wrong.” – Albert Einstein
German garden gnome. By Colibri1968 at English Wikipedia (Transferred from en.wikipedia to Commons.) [Public domain], via Wikimedia CommonsGuest essay by Eric Worrall
One thing which struck me about the recent climate science hearing is how little attention was paid to Dr. John Christy’s demonstration of a flawed climate model prediction – the missing Tropospheric hotspot.
A flawed prediction does not automatically mean the models are totally wrong – but it is a strong indicator that something isn’t right.
Consider the primary observation. The world has warmed since the mid 1850s, and for the sake of argument lets assume that the world has warmed since the mid 1930s.
Given that warming, you could propose a number of different theories for the cause of that warming, for example;
1. Chaotic shifts in ocean currents or solar influences have influenced global temperature.
2. Anthropogenic CO2 emissions have caused global temperature to rise
View original post 872 more words
‘Deniers,’ lies and politics
Posted: April 2, 2017 Filed under: Climate science, Hockey Stick, Michael Mann, Politics | Tags: Bogus Climate Consensus, Climate Change, Climate politics, Climate science, Global Warming, Hockey Stick Fraud, Judith Curry, Michael Mann, US Senate Testimony Leave a comment“I always thought that there would be consequences for lying during Congressional testimony. I guess not. Mann got caught out in several blatant lies during the Hearing.”
Nuff said. Other than well done JC for your bravery in the face of smear and slander by peers when your only crime was sticking up for and valuing the “scientific method”. Which simply involves questioning and challenging the preferred wisdom of the day (i.e. “Manufactured consensus”) via data and observation.
But sadly, within the established field of climate ‘science’, questioning the preferred wisdom is taboo and heresy.
This is politics, not science.
by Judith Curry
House Science Committee Hearing: where the so-called ‘deniers’ behave like scientists and the defender of the establishment consensus . . . lies.
View original post 1,328 more words
Lamar Smith lays out political strategy at climate conference
Posted: March 25, 2017 Filed under: Sceptics | Tags: Climate Change, Climate science, Congress, John Christy, Judith Curry, Lamar Smith, Mann-Made Global Warming, Pielke Jr, Scepticism is Science, Scientific Method, US Senate Testimony Leave a comment““That’s why this hearing is going to be so much fun,” Smith said with a huge grin on his normally impassive face.”
Mann-made climate change on the Congressional senate stand! I cannot wait. Nor can the popcorn 🍿!
The warmist AAAS sucks lemons in advance of the US Senate climate change hearing next week. They resent his ‘agenda’ as it opposes theirs.
Representative Lamar Smith (R–TX) rarely expresses his true feelings in public.
But speaking yesterday to a like-minded crowd of climate change doubters and skeptics, the chairman of the science committee in the U.S. House of Representatives acknowledged that the committee is now a tool to advance his political agenda rather than a forum to examine important issues facing the U.S. research community.
“Next week we’re going to have a hearing on our favorite subject of climate change and also on the scientific method, which has been repeatedly ignored by the so-called self-professed climate scientists,” Smith told the Heartland Institute’s 12th annual conference on climate change in Washington, D.C.
View original post 144 more words
Richard Lindzen: Cool it on the climate
Posted: December 5, 2013 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Carbon Dioxide, Climate, Climate Changes, Climate History, Climate science, Consensus, Empirical Evidence, Fact Check, Global Temperature, Govt Climate Agenda, Science | Tags: Climate rationalist, Richard Lindzen, US Senate Testimony Leave a comment“We need to get some broad based support,
to capture the public’s imagination…
So we have to offer up scary scenarios,
make simplified, dramatic statements
and make little mention of any doubts…
Each of us has to decide what the right balance
is between being effective and being honest.“
– Prof. Stephen Schneider,
Stanford Professor of Climatology,
lead author of many IPCC reports
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.“
– Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation
•••
Re-pressed via Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog :
Professor Richard S. Lindzen, arguably the world’s most prominent climate scientist, testifies to the US House Committee on Science and Technology:
I will simply try to clarify what the debate over climate change is really about. It most certainly is not about whether climate is changing: it always is. It is not about whether CO2 is increasing: it clearly is. It is not about whether the increase in CO2, by itself, will lead to some warming: it should. The debate is simply over the matter of how much warming the increase in CO2 can lead to, and the connection of such warming to the innumerable claimed catastrophes.
The evidence is that the increase in CO2 will lead to very little warming, and that the connection of this minimal warming (or even significant warming) to the purported catastrophes is also minimal. The arguments on which the catastrophic claims are made are extremely weak – and commonly acknowledged as such….
Current global warming alarm hardly represents a plausible proposition. Twenty years of repetition and escalation of claims does not make it more plausible. Quite the contrary, the failure to improve the case over 20 years makes the case even less plausible as does the evidence from climategate and other instances of overt cheating.
In the meantime, while I avoid making forecasts for tenths of a degree change in globally averaged temperature anomaly, I am quite willing to state that unprecedented climate catastrophes are not on the horizon though in several thousand years we may return to an ice age.
But this is about faith, not reason.
UPDATE
Still waiting for more warming. The UAH temperatures, updated now for November:
Richard Lindzen: Cool it on the climate | Herald Sun Andrew Bolt Blog.
Global Warming: How to approach the science – Testimony Richard Lindzen 2010 – Via WattsUpWithThat
See Also :
- Bureaucratic Dioxide | CACA (Richard Lindzen)
•••
Climatism Related Links :
- Climate Change Insanity Never Changes | CACA
- The Truth About the Global Warming Agenda by Former NASA Climatologist | CACA
- State Of The Climate Report | CACA
- Mankind’s Shocking Alteration Of The Atmosphere | CACA
- NATURE STUDY Confirms Global Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago | CACA
- Understanding The Global Warming “Pause” | CACA
- Shock News : UN Wants To Ban Private Property And Create “Human Habitat Settlement Zones” | CACA
- RSS Shows No Warming In Australia | CACA
- NATURE STUDY Confirms Global Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago | CACA
- GLOBAL WARMING THEORY – Circular reasoning at its best
- Shock News : UN IPCC Rewrote Temperature History To Suit Their Political Agenda | CACA
Recent Comments