“Why doesn’t peer-review catch these blatant errors?”
Further merit to the term “pal-review” which has sadly become common-speak in reference to the corrupt world of anthropogenic climate science.
Check out yesterday’s mind-blowing peer-reviewed Arctic fraud from NOAA’s chief scientist – Rick Spinrad
The US weather Bureau reported exactly the same thing in 1922. Seals disappearing and fish being forced northwards. However, in 1922 the reported warming was much larger than 2.3 degrees.
In 1947, scientists reported 10 degrees Arctic warming, much more than the 2.3 degrees reported by Rick Spinrad.
Glaciers were disappearing from Alaska to Norway.
The sea ice maximum occurred at the end of March, not February 25 as Spinrad claimed, and extent is the highest since at least 2004, not the “lowest on record”
Satellites show that recent Arctic temperatures peaked…
View original post 219 more words
The much more comprehensive and accurate satellite data shows us that the last time there was any ‘global warming’, at all, was when Bill Clinton dumped his own legacy in the White House. “I did not have sexual relations with that woman.” – 1998.
Earth’s atmosphere has not warmed for decades, as shown by both satellites and radiosonde data.
However, the White House is desperate to create a fake climate legacy, and had their employees at NOAA and NASA tamper with temperature data – so that 100% fraudulent headlines like this could come out ahead of the Paris conference.
The only record being broken is the amount of data tampering going on at government agencies.
Until the latest massive fraud push ahead of Paris, NASA and NOAA both made it clear that Earth was not warming significantly this century.
Satellite temperatures make it clear that the NASA/NOAA graphs are nonsense.
Here in the US, we have been having progressively less hot weather – with the last three years being among the least…
View original post 66 more words
Excerpt from JC Refections :
I’ve heard enough behind the scenes (including discussions with NOAA employees) that I am siding with Rep. Smith on this one.
The politicization of climate science has gotten extreme. I don’t know where to start in trying to ameliorate this situation, but Congressional oversight and investigation into what is going on in government labs does not seem inappropriate under these circumstances.
It’s a sad state of affairs that climate science has come to this.
When flatlining temperatures wreck your global warming agenda, refusing to rise after 18+ long years in hiatus, despite record human CO2 emissions over that same period, simply homogenise, adjust (tamper) with the data.
As simple, easy and as criminal as that.
“Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.” is the political ideology of the totalitarian government of Oceania [Obama] in George Orwell’s [Tom Karl’s] dystopian novel [Gov Agency] Nineteen Eighty-Four [NOAA].”
NOAA recently altered their data, to unilaterally wipe out the hiatus which the consensus had agreed upon for a decade.
January : Climate Change: Global Temperature | NOAA Climate.gov
September : Climate at a Glance (NCEI)
Now they are refusing to turn over their communications about this flagrant manipulation, just ahead of Barack Obama’s Paris scam.
Make no mistake about it. This is the biggest fraud in history, and it is being directed by the White House.