Advertisements

THE SUN : Climate Changer, Climate Driver, Climate Disruptor

***

LAST week we analysed the profound effect that the Sun has on Earth’s climate and the sinister reasons as to why the Climate Crisis Industry almost completely dismisses it as having any effect on climate and weather:

THE SUN : Climate Control Knob, Enemy Of The Climate Cult | Climatism

THROUGH the forensic lens of Tony Heller’s excellent research, let’s take a deeper dive into the ‘conveniently’ dismissed nuclear-powered giant in the sky that has the ability to generate temperature swings of 40 degrees centigrade on any given day. And whose light, that takes 8 minutes and 20 seconds to reach Earth, delivers enough energy in one hour to power the world economy for an entire year! Read the rest of this entry »

Advertisements

Record Breaking Winter Cold? Don’t Worry, the Climate Explainers Have it Covered

“Even this week’s cold weather is probably being caused at least in part by global warming, said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan.”

BUT wait, there’s more! …

“So what happens if global temperatures take a real plunge for a sustained period? Don’t worry, the explainers have that one covered as well – James Hansen, former NASA GISS Director, published a paper which suggests global warming will trigger a short ice age in the near future…”

ERGO, no! There is no “weather or climate shift [that could] cast doubt on the dominance of that wicked little trace molecule.”

HOT, cold, wet, dry, snow, drought, flood, heatwave, blizzard – it’s ALL “global warming” aka “climate change” aka “climate disruption” and it’s ALL your fault!

🤦‍♂️

Watts Up With That?

Graph from p3768 of J. Hansen et al.: Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms. Graph from p3768 of J. Hansen et al.: Ice melt, sea level rise and superstorms.

Guest essay by Eric Worrall

Does record breaking winter cold cast doubt on climate predictions of milder winters? Could ANY weather or climate shift cast doubt on the dominance of that wicked little trace molecule? Apparently not, according to leading climate explainers.

It’s cold outside, but that doesn’t mean climate change isn’t real

Sammy Roth, USA TODAY Published 5:13 p.m. ET Dec. 28, 2017

This week’s cold snap has brought record-low temperatures, freezing rain and heavy snow to much of the United States. But 2017 is still on track to be the second- or third-hottest year ever recorded globally — and scientists say climate change is to blame.

Even this week’s cold weather is probably being caused at least in part by global warming, said Jonathan Overpeck, a climate scientist at the University of Michigan.

View original post 817 more words


German Professor : NASA Has Fiddled Climate Data On ‘Unbelievable’ Scale

James-Hansen-Getty-640x480.png

CARL DE SOUZA/AFP/Getty Images

Brietbart’s James Delingpole confirming what sceptics have been observing with disgust for years and what thankfully the world is now becoming increasingly clear about – that NASA, under the directorship of climate change activist Gavin Schmidt and before him James Hansen (pictured) arrested 4 times for climate activism, is scandalously tampering with one of the four major global temperature data sets – GISS.

This is the same data set used by much of the climate science cabal, agenda-driven politicians and the alarmist mainstream media to claim the “Hottest Year Ever” meme.

See: Understanding The “Hottest Year Evah” | Climatism

•••

by JAMES DELINGPOLE24 Nov 2015

A German professor has confirmed what skeptics from Britain to the US have long suspected: that NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies has largely invented “global warming” by tampering with the raw temperature data records.

Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert is a retired geologist and data computation expert. He has painstakingly examined and tabulated all NASA GISS’s temperature data series, taken from 1153 stations and going back to 1881. His conclusion: that if you look at the raw data, as opposed to NASA’s revisions, you’ll find that since 1940 the planet has been cooling, not warming.

According to Günter Ederer, the German journalist who has reported on Ewert’s findings:

From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.

Apart from Australia, the planet has in fact been on a cooling trend:

Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C […]. The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.

But the activist scientists at NASA GISS – initially led by James Hansen (pictured above), later by Gavin Schmidt – wanted the records they are in charge of maintaining to show warming not cooling, so they began systematically adjusting the data for various spurious reasons using ten different methods.

The most commonly used ones were:

• Reducing the annual mean in the early phase.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.

Ewert’s findings echo that of US meteorologists Joseph D’Aleo and Anthony Watts who examined 6,000 NASA weather stations and found a host of irregularities both with the way they were sited and how the raw data had been adjusted to reflect such influences as the Urban Heat Island effect.

Britain’s Paul Homewood is also on NASA GISS’s case. Here he shows the shocking extent of the adjustments they have made to a temperature record in Brazil which has been altered so that a cooling trend becomes a warming trend.

station_thumb8

Unadjusted temperature record: shows cooling trend.

station_thumb9

Adjusted temperature record: shows warming trend.

For still more evidence of NASA’s adjustments, check out Alterations to Climate Data at Tony Heller’s Real Climate Science.
Truly, these people have no shame.
•••
Climate Fraud Resource File :

See also :


World’s Leading Scientist Says The Arctic Will Be Ice-Free By 2013


A Consistent Pattern Of Data Tampering Across The Planet

Real Science

NASA has corrupted the temperature record across the entire planet, in order to create the appearance of warming. The graph below shows US temperatures – Hansen 1999 in blue, and GISS in red. The graphs are normalized to the 1997 five year mean lines.

ScreenHunter_205 Feb. 20 06.49

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and Plots

The next four graphs show how GISS has cooled the past globally, and at all three latitude bands since Hansen 1981.

ScreenHunter_203 Feb. 20 06.35ScreenHunter_202 Feb. 20 06.32ScreenHunter_195 Feb. 20 06.14ScreenHunter_192 Feb. 20 06.04

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

Similarly, NOAA (red) has cooled the US past since their 1990 report (black)

BgZh6BcCYAEji0A

www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/bams-sotc/climate-assessment-1981-1990.pdf

The most damning graph of all though is the one below, showing how NOAA (red) is cooling the past relative to their own thermometer data (blue)

BgqD5wpCMAAjkG3

View original post


A Good Visualization Of US Temperature Fraud

Real Science

If NCDC didn’t tamper with the data, the warming scam would collapse instantly. Measured temperatures in blue. Reported temperatures in red.

ScreenHunter_37 Feb. 14 23.52

View original post


SUN NEWS EXCLUSIVE : NASA Fudges Historical Temperature Data

He who controls the past controls the future. He who controls the present controls the past.

•••

Government scientists weren’t convinced that the public would buy the global warming scam if global temperature graphs showed that the 1930’s were comparably the hottest decade of the 20th Century. So they cooled the past, and warmed the present…

Sun News exclusive interview with Climate Depot’s Marc Morano : NASA fudges historical temperature numbers to bolster claim that global warming exists (click to play):

Screen Shot 2014-02-13 at , February 13, 9.13.12 pm

NASA funding facts or fiction? : Prime time : SunNews Video Gallery

•••

In 1975, the National Academy of Sciences reported 0.5C Northern Hemisphere cooling from 1940-1970

NAS

As did NCAR

ScreenHunter_393 May. 21 04.35

newsweek_coolingworld.pdf

NOAA/CRU/NASA erased the post-1940 cooling, just like they said they were going to do in their private E-mails. (Real Science)

fig-a-9

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and Plots

screenhunter_400-feb-09-04-21

via Real Science – Phil Jones Fishing For Excuses To Kill Off Global Cooling.

screenhunter_303-feb-07-09-19

They did exactly what Wigley was suggesting, removing more than 0.15 C from 1940′s global temperatures. This tampering is what made the hockey stick possible :

screenhunter_230-feb-06-05-291

•••

Government scientists did the same thing with the ‘inconvenient’ Medieval Warm Period :

In the 1990 IPCC report, the Medieval Warm Period was much warmer than the late 19th century.

FARTemperature

http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/far/wg_I/ipcc_far_wg_I_full_report.pdf

But in the 2001 IPCC report, the Medieval Warm period disappeared and became much cooler than the late 20th century.

HockeyStick

By pure coincidence, in the year 1995 the IPCC made a decision to make the Medieval Warm Period disappear.

Screen Shot 2013-11-27 at , November 27, 2.30.47 PM

http://epw.senate.gov/hearing_statements.cfm?id=266543

•••

In case you missed it …

U.S. Senate Committee 

Statement of Dr. David Deming :

I had another interesting experience around the time my paper in Science was published. I received an astonishing email from a major researcher in the area of climate change. He said, “We have to get rid of the Medieval Warm Period.”

The existence of the MWP had been recognized in the scientific literature for decades. But now it was a major embarrassment to those maintaining that the 20th century warming was truly anomalous. It had to be “gotten rid of.”

* For Peer-Reviewed evidence that proves the Medieval Warm Period was warmer than today see : Shock News : UN IPCC Rewrote Temperature History To Suit Their Political Agenda | CACA

H/t to Tundra Swans

•••

Scientific Fraud Related :

For Charts and Evidence see Real Science’s ‘Motherlode’ Series :

NASA / NOAA / IPCC  Data Tampering :

Climatism Realted :