Removing The 1940’s Blip

“Without all of this massive data tampering by the Hockey Team, the global warming story collapses.”

So true.

Real Science

As of 1975, there was nearly unanimous consensus among experts that the first half of the 20th century was exceptionally warm, and that temperatures had plummeted after 1940.

The National Academy of Sciences published this graph, showing that the late 1960’s were cooler than the turn of the 20th century.

ScreenHunter_600 Jun. 21 17.05

From 1900 to 1950, there was dramatic retreat of ice in the Northern Hemisphere

POLAR ICE THAW INCREASING  GLACIERS SAID TO BE MELTING

CLEVELAND, Feb. 16 (A.A.P.) Dr. William S. Carlson, an Arctic expert, said to-night that the Polar icecaps were melting at an astonishing and unexplained rate and were threatening to swamp seaports  by raising the ocean levels.

The glaciers of Norway and Alaska are only half the size they were 50 years ago. The temperature around Spitsbergen has so modified that the sailing time has lengthened from three to eight months of the year,” he said. ‘

18 Feb 1952 – POLAR ICE THAW INCREASING GLACIERS SAID TO [?]…

View original post 382 more words


A Consistent Pattern Of Data Tampering Across The Planet

Real Science

NASA has corrupted the temperature record across the entire planet, in order to create the appearance of warming. The graph below shows US temperatures – Hansen 1999 in blue, and GISS in red. The graphs are normalized to the 1997 five year mean lines.

ScreenHunter_205 Feb. 20 06.49

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

Data.GISS: GISS Surface Temperature Analysis: Analysis Graphs and Plots

The next four graphs show how GISS has cooled the past globally, and at all three latitude bands since Hansen 1981.

ScreenHunter_203 Feb. 20 06.35ScreenHunter_202 Feb. 20 06.32ScreenHunter_195 Feb. 20 06.14ScreenHunter_192 Feb. 20 06.04

pubs.giss.nasa.gov/docs/1981/1981_Hansen_etal_1.pdf

Similarly, NOAA (red) has cooled the US past since their 1990 report (black)

BgZh6BcCYAEji0A

www1.ncdc.noaa.gov/pub/data/cmb/bams-sotc/climate-assessment-1981-1990.pdf

The most damning graph of all though is the one below, showing how NOAA (red) is cooling the past relative to their own thermometer data (blue)

BgqD5wpCMAAjkG3

View original post


GLOBAL WARMING Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History

The data doesn’t matter. We’re not basing our recommendations
on the data. We’re basing them on the climate models
.”
– Prof. Chris Folland,
Hadley Centre for Climate Prediction and Research

It doesn’t matter what is true,
it only matters what people believe is true
.”
– Paul Watson,
co-founder of Greenpeace

“As we all know, this isn’t about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.”

– Michael E. Mann | Climategate Emails

aaa jones

“Kevin and I will keep (skeptic papers) out (of IPCC) somehow – even if we have to redefine what peer-review literature is” – Phil Jones | Climategate Emails

“As you know, I’m not political. If anything, I would like to see the climate change happen, so the science could be proved right, regardless of the consequences. This isn’t being political, it is being selfish.” – Phil Jones

•••

If you think that the tampering of the earth’s temperature record, to fit the man-made global warming narrative, is another climate denier conspiracy theory, then read this Climategate email from the UK’s leading climate expert, Phil Jones, to the UK Met Office and officials…

screenhunter_400-feb-09-04-21

via Real Science – Phil Jones Fishing For Excuses To Kill Off Global Cooling.

UPDATE

He who controls the past, controls the future. He who controls the present, controls the past …

screenhunter_303-feb-07-09-19

They did exactly what Wigley was suggesting, removing more than 0.15 C from 1940′s global temperatures. This tampering is what made the hockey stick possible.

If the present refuses to get warmer, then the past must become cooler …

screenhunter_230-feb-06-05-291

Motherlode Part III | Real Science

•••

UPDATE

MUST SEE Video : Sun news – NASA fudges historical temperature numbers to bolster claim that global warming exists.

Screen Shot 2014-02-13 at , February 13, 9.13.12 pm

NASA funding facts or fiction? : Prime time : SunNews Video Gallery

See Also : SUN NEWS EXCLUSIVE : NASA Fudges Historical Temperature Data | Climatism

•••

UPDATE

via Steve Goddard’s Real Science :

NASA is constantly altering their historical data to create the appearance of a non-existent warming trend.

GISS-1981-2002-2014-global

gissus19992014

The NASA graphs are useful for politicians who want to raise taxes, and for insurance companies who want to raise premiums – but are worse than useless for scientists who actually want to understand the climate. They show the exact opposite of what is happening to the climate.

The NASA Temperature Record Is A Farce | Real Science

•••

UPDATE

MUST SEE Climategate Video :

The ‘still’ present Director of the UK’s Climatic Research Unit (CRU), ‘Scientist’ Phil Jones gives evidence to the UK Parliamentary Enquiry into Climategate 2009 …

“I’ve obviously written some awful emails, and I fully admit that …”

•••

UPDATE (COP21 November 2015)

Biggest Fraud In History – Perpetrated By Tom Karl And Gavin Schmidt

•••

More NASA fraud here:

The Biggest Fraud In Science History http://wp.me/p3Bc8A-2vA via @JWSpry

For Charts and Evidence see Real Science’s ‘Motherlode’ Series :

Climategate Related :

NASA / NOAA / IPCC  Temperature Data Fraud Related :

Climatism Related :


NASA Giving The Past A Good Thrashing Since 1999


NASA : If The Present Refuses To Get Warmer, Then The Past Must Get Cooler


Another View Of NASA Temperature Data Tampering

We are getting close to catastrophic tipping points,
despite the fact that most people barely notice the warming yet
.”
– Dr James Hansen,
NASA researcher

“As we all know, this isn’t about truth at all, its about plausibly deniable accusations.” 

– Michael E. Mann | Climategate Emails

We’ve got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.

– Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation

“When facts don’t fit the theory, change the facts.” – Albert Einstein /sarc

•••
Re-pressed from Real Science

Another View Of NASA Temperature Data Tampering

Posted on Real ScienceNovember 11, 2013 by 

The 1999 NASA version of US temperatures showed a sharp decline from the 1930′s to the 1990′s.

 aaaaa screenhunter_165-nov-09-18-251

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

•••

In 1999 NASA’s then climate chief, James Hansen made these remarkable comments:

Empirical evidence does not lend much support to the notion that climate is headed precipitately toward more extreme heat and drought. The drought of 1999 covered a smaller area than the 1988 drought, when the Mississippi almost dried up. And 1988 was a temporary inconvenience as compared with repeated droughts during the 1930s “Dust Bowl” that caused an exodus from the prairies, as chronicled in Steinbeck’s Grapes of Wrath.

In the U.S. there has been little temperature change in the past 50 years, the time of rapidly increasing greenhouse gases — in fact, there was a slight cooling throughout much of the country.

Indeed, in the U.S. the warmest decade was the 1930s and the warmest year was 1934.

•••

EPA Confirms Hansen, showing the worst Heat Waves occurred in the 1930s :

screenhunter_116-jul-21-17-55

www.epa.gov/climate/climatechange/pdfs/print_heat-waves.pdf

•••

In 1989, NOAA and the UK’s leading expert, Dr Phil Jones, agreed with Hansen that US had not warmed.

February 04, 1989

Last week, scientists from the United States Commerce Department’s National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration said that a study of temperature readings for the contiguous 48 states over the last century showed there had been no significant change in average temperature over that period.

Dr. (Phil) Jones said in a telephone interview today that his own results for the 48 states agreed with those findings.

But in the year 2000, NASA and NOAA altered the historical US temperature record, which now shows that there was about one degree centigrade US warming during the century before 1989.

The current version shows an increase from the 1930′s to the 1990′s. The past magically changed!

hansen-fudge-giss-us-2008

Fig.D.gif (525×438)

A much more accurate description of how the data set was altered :

– They have dramatically cooled the past to create the false impression of a warming trend, and eliminate the hot 1930′s.

BeMA4wFCAAAelN3

The blink comparator below shows the huge changes which have been made to the US temperature record since 1999. The past has been massively cooled, and the present has been massively warmed. A cooling trend has been turned into a warming trend, by adjusting the data.

1998changesannotated

•••

Eco-activist James Hansen was arrested 3 times whilst working in the top climate job at NASA :

6093669065_a3423161a6 20130213_hansenjamesarrest1 hansenjamesarrest james-hansen-arrested-at-white-house

Question – Any chance Hansen’s work on one of the four main global temperature data sets ‘GISS’ was at risk or subject to any adjustment bias?

AnswerWarming in the US is indeed Man-Made. Hansen quit NASA in Aril 2013, to become a full-time Environmental Activist.

See :

•••

UPDATE

Screen Shot 2013-11-11 at , November 11, 8.13.48 AM
Controversies – Judge Orders NASA to Release Climate Change-Related Documents – AllGov – News
•••
UPDATE

Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History

•••

UPDATE

Government Scientists Couldn’t Find Any Climate Change, So They Simply Manufactured It

Posted: December 19, 2013  

•••

UPDATE

Shock News : “U.S. Agencies Accused of Fudging Data to Show Global Warming”

Posted: January 30, 2014

•••

Climate Fraud Related :

More Climate Fraud :

Quote Source – The Green Agenda


CEI wins FOIA tiff with NASA via judicial order

Climatism comment :

  • A BIG win for Science.
  • A MASSIVE blow to NASA, the climate alarm industry and perpetrators of scientific fraud.

1998changesannotated

See : Real Science Fraud File | CACA

Watts Up With That?

From AllGov.com with lots of spin (h/t to reader Dennis)

Judge Orders NASA to Release Climate Change-Related Documents

A climate change denial group once funded by oil giant ExxonMobil (2012 revenues: $453.123 billion) won a legal victory last week over NASA when a federal judge ordered the space agency to turn over more documents related to its 2007 revisions of global temperature data. Release of the information will have no effect on the climate change data that scientists are using to determine the extent of global warming that is occurring.

The controversy started in August 2007, when statistician Stephen McIntyre found an error in NASA’s temperature data sets that he said caused temperatures in the U.S. from the year 2000 onward to be overstated. After posting “his findings on his website ClimateAudit.org,” according to Judge Barbara Rothstein’s decision, McIntyre “emailed them to NASA climate scientists” at the Goddard Institute…

View original post 168 more words


GISS Data Tampering – Worse Than You Thought

Climatism Comment : This stuff needs to be circulated. Done.

Real Science

The graph below shows GISS US temperatures five year mean. At first glance, it looks like the US is really heating up.

ScreenHunter_163 Nov. 09 18.13

data.giss.nasa.gov/gistemp/graphs_v3/Fig.D.txt

Now compare that to the actual GHCN thermometer data which the graph is based on. They look nothing alike. The 1930s were much hotter.

ScreenHunter_161 Nov. 09 18.01

Index of /pub/data/ghcn/daily/hcn/

The next graph overlays the published GISS temperature (red) on the thermometer data (blue) normalized to 2003. You can see that they have massively cooled the past relative to the present – to create the appearance of non-existent warming.

ScreenHunter_169 Nov. 09 18.54

Next, let’s compare the actual data to what GISS published in 1999, before they started their most serious tampering.

ScreenHunter_165 Nov. 09 18.25

NASA GISS: Science Briefs: Whither U.S. Climate?

The next graph overlays the thermometer data (blue) on the 1999 GISS graph. You can see that there was much less tampering going on at that time.

ScreenHunter_168 Nov. 09 18.35

The next graph is a bonus, which overlays…

View original post 162 more words


GISS/NOAA/CRU Climate Fraud Update

Real Science

The Earth was very warm in the 1920s.

ScreenHunter_38 Nov. 05 20.27

07 Apr 1923 – NORTH POLE MELTING. CHANGE OF CLIMATE. MANY GLAC…

In 1975, the National Academy of Sciences correctly showed the 1920’s as a warm period, much warmer than the cold 1970s.

ScreenHunter_288 Sep. 06 15.12

Science News

But the usual band of criminals have since changed the temperature record to make the 1920’s much cooler than the 1970’s

HadCrut

The 1970’s were cold.

Climate Change and its Effect on World Food
by Walter Orr Roberts
National Center for Atmospheric Research, Boulder, Colorado

In February of 1972 earth-orbiting artificial satellites revealed the existence of a greatly increased area of the snow and ice cover of the north polar cap as compared to all previous years of space age observations ….. The Earth may have entered a new “little ice age”.

www.iaea.org/Publications/Magazines/Bulletin/Bull165/16505796265.pdf

Early in the 1970s, a series of adverse climatic anomalies occurred. …. The world’s snow and ice…

View original post 42 more words


The Very High Price Of NOAA/NASA Data Tampering

Climatism comment : Please see : Real Science Fraud File | CACA

Real Science

NOAA and NASA do spectacular amounts of tampering to the US temperature data set, which actually reverses the measured trend. This comes at a very high price.

  1. The history of the country is destroyed
  2. Bad policy is implemented as a result
  3. Children’s educations are wrecked by feeding them intellectual garbage
  4. The economy is damaged by taxes and destructive policies to restrict CO2
  5. Science itself is wrecked. People attempting to interpret the data are trying to draw conclusions based on garbage data. Thus their conclusions are also garbage.

Amazing how a small handful of unscrupulous people can wreak so much havoc.

View original post