ARCTIC SEA ICE — Ice Traps Narwhals
Posted: December 11, 2017 Filed under: Alarmist media, Arctic, Fact Check, Green Agenda, Michael Mann, Polar Bears, Politics, Propaganda, Pseudo-Science, Religion, Science | Tags: Alarmism, Alarmsim, Arctic Ocean, Arctic Sea Ice, Climate Change, Climate politics, death spiral, Global Warming, Michael Mann, Narwhals, nature, Polar Bears, pseudoscience, Sea Ice, Susan Crockford, wildlife Leave a comment“The pity is that Alarmist media cannot seem to educate the public, and doesn’t do a little reading-up on the subject, but rather seems determined to horrify. Horror is not helpful, unless your intent is to herd people with a sort of bullying. To paraphrase FDR, in truth we have nothing to be horrified about but horror itself.”
A truly glorious read on the wonders of the Arctic wilderness and its wildlife, to the not so wondrous world of the politicisation of climate ‘science’…
Thanks Caleb!
Sunrise's Swansong
One thing that has fascinated me, in my study of sea-ice, is how swiftly vast areas can freeze over. This is apparent from many sources.
The captains of whaling ships, tempted north by whale’s habit of hunting in the rich ecosystem that exists at the very edge of the ice, sometimes appear like cowards for turning tail and fleeing the refreeze far before the whales chose to depart. (You might think whales would know best when to depart, for they suffocate when trapped under ice). However this choice does not seem so foolish once you understand larger whales could break up through a foot of ice, (with smaller beluga whales following and using the air-holes big whales created), while, without a strong following wind, a sailing craft could be bogged down and halted by a skim of ice only an inch thick. And despite all precautions, the ice formed so…
View original post 1,799 more words
‘Deniers,’ lies and politics
Posted: April 2, 2017 Filed under: Climate science, Hockey Stick, Michael Mann, Politics | Tags: Bogus Climate Consensus, Climate Change, Climate politics, Climate science, Global Warming, Hockey Stick Fraud, Judith Curry, Michael Mann, US Senate Testimony Leave a comment“I always thought that there would be consequences for lying during Congressional testimony. I guess not. Mann got caught out in several blatant lies during the Hearing.”
Nuff said. Other than well done JC for your bravery in the face of smear and slander by peers when your only crime was sticking up for and valuing the “scientific method”. Which simply involves questioning and challenging the preferred wisdom of the day (i.e. “Manufactured consensus”) via data and observation.
But sadly, within the established field of climate ‘science’, questioning the preferred wisdom is taboo and heresy.
This is politics, not science.
Climate Etc.
by Judith Curry
House Science Committee Hearing: where the so-called ‘deniers’ behave like scientists and the defender of the establishment consensus . . . lies.
View original post 1,328 more words
Climate Science Was Broken
Posted: June 15, 2016 Filed under: Climate Alarmism, Climate science, Environmentalism, Global Temperature, Government Grants/Funding, Govt Climate Agenda, Green Agenda, Ideology, IPCC, Politics, Pseudo-Science, Religion, Sceptics, Scientific Fraud, UN, UNEP, UNFCCC | Tags: Alarmism, Climate politics, Climate science, Corrupt Science, Environmentalism, Richard Lindzen, Scientific Fraud, UN, UNEP, UNFCCC Leave a comment“we will show how political bodies act to control scientific institutions, how scientists adjust both data and even theory to accommodate politically correct positions, and how opposition to these positions is disposed of.” – Richard Lindzen on the broken field of ‘climate science’…
Science Matters
Natural scientists have sought to understand the workings of the climate system and its various parts. But in recent decades the process of discovery has been subverted, and the science is going in circles. Richard Lindzen tells how it came to this in his essay: Climate Science: Is it Currently Designed to Answer Questions?
As you might guess, the title is a rhetorical question. From his long and deep experience with the field, Richard Lindzen can and does describe in detail how and why climatology is failing as a natural science. The machinations and convolutions bring to mind the quotation:
Laws are like sausages, it is better not to see them being made.
– Otto von Bismarck
Perhaps because the field was contaminated with political aims early on, the whole enterprise has come to resemble a legislative process:
Lindzen sets the record straight with names and maneuvers which have crippled…
View original post 419 more words
Recent Comments