Posted: May 12, 2018 Filed under: Alarmist media, Alarmist Predictions, Carbon Dioxide, Climate science, Climatism, CO2, Dud predictions, Fake News, Taxpayer waste, Uncategorized | Tags: Alarmism, Carbon Dioxide, carbon dioxide emissions, Climate Change, Climate Change Alarmism, Climate science, Climatism, CO2, Earth Sciences, Fake News, Global Warming, Global Warming Alarmism, Mother Nature, nature, pseudoscience, volcanoes
COLOURLESS, odourless, tasteless, non-reactive, trace gas and plant food ‘carbon dioxide’ – the miracle molecule that, according to ‘scientists’, causes these phenomena, amongst a million other things (see link 20) !
- Incredible shrinking sheep
- Boy Scout tornado deaths
- Lobster Cannibalism
- Longer days
- Shorter days
- Collapse of gingerbread houses in Sweden
- Surge in fatal shark attacks
- Bigger tuna fish
- Fish shrinkage
- Glacier grows (California)
- Glaciers on Snowden
- Longer days
- Shorter days
- Screwed-up love making
- The Sinking of The Titanic
- No more red-haired people
- Pear-shaped women
- Incontinent, impotent bald guys with extra hair growing from his toes
- A few other things caused by global warming…
AND now, according to ‘esteemed’ taxpayer funded climate ‘scientists’, carbon dioxide has the power to shift tectonic plates summoning deadly Volcanoes!
WOW! What a gas.
ALL of a sudden, taxing and demonising this essential trace gas that plants use as food to grow and create oxygen, makes a whole lotta sense! Not.
HUMOROUS observation via Ms. Donna on Twitter :
TAXPAYER funded ‘scientists’ should be studying the effects of Volcanoes on our climate, not the other way around!
The effect of volcanoes on climate
The relationship between volcanoes and climate is a very complex one. From reading the media one gets the impression that they are some sort of climatic wild card. They are used to explain the cooling after the Pinatubo eruption, or the Little Ice Age cooling as a detriment to the solar hypothesis. But they are also used to explain the warming leading to mass extinctions in the distant past.
Excellent read here via WUWT …
See also :
“Hottest Year Evahh” related :
Origins Of The Global Warming Scam :
(Climate rationalists are still waiting for that “big oil” cheque to arrive in the mail!)
Click link for more info…TQ! Jamie.
Posted: May 1, 2018 Filed under: Carbon Dioxide, Climate science, Climatism, CO2, Global Cooling, Global Temperature, NASA, The Pause, The Sun, Uncategorized | Tags: carbon dioxide emissions, Climate Change, Climate Change Hoax, Climate Change Scam, Climate Control Knob, Climate science, CO2, Emissions, global cooling, Global Temperature, Global Warming, Global Warming Hoax, Global Warming Scam, IPCC, nasa, Sunspots, The Sun, UN, UNFCCC
THE Sun is 4.6 billion years old.
THE Sun has surface area is 11,990 times that of the Earth’s. Its diameter is around 1,392,000 kilometres (865,000 miles), about 110 times wider than Earth’s.
THE mass of the Sun is approximately 330,000 times greater than that of Earth. You can fit 1.3 million earths into it.
THE Sun contains 99.86% of the mass in the Solar System.
THE Sun generates huge amounts of energy by combining hydrogen nuclei into helium. This process is called nuclear fusion.
THE Sun’s surface temperature is 5,500 °C.
THE Sun’s core is around 13600000 degrees Celsius.
LIGHT from the Sun reaches Earth in 8 minutes and 20 seconds.
THE Aurora Borealis and Aurora Australis are caused by the interaction of solar winds with Earth’s atmosphere. The solar wind is contains charged particles such as electrons and protons. They escape the Sun’s intense gravity because of their high kinetic energy and the high temperature of the Sun’s corona (a type of plasma atmosphere that extends into space).
ALL that power and life-sustaining magnificence! And yet, the Sun is completely dismissed as a key driver of climate by the climate crisis industry. Why? Because, you cannot control the Sun, therefore you would be laughed out of town if you tried to tax voters for climate changes or weather extremes caused by the Sun.
THEREFORE, your lifestyle and emissions are to blame – CO2 the patsy – tax away and obey!
“Scientists now claim that a 0.0001 mole fraction increase in CO2 over the past century controls the climate. This is because the Sun can’t be controlled, scientists can’t pretend they know how to prevent bad weather, and politicians can’t use sunspots as an excuse to raise taxes and control energy policy.” – Tony Heller
CLIMATE alarmist outfit “Union Of Concerned Scientists“ recognises the Sun as a key driver of climate only up until the late 1970’s, before politics, ideology, power and control entered the ‘science’ of climate. The late 1970’s also corresponds nicely with a cyclical rise in global temps following the well-catalogued 70’s “global cooling” scare :
“Over the time-scale of millions of years, the change in solar intensity is a critical factor influencing climate (e.g., ice ages). However, changes in the rate of solar heating over the last century cannot account for the magnitude of the rise in global mean temperature since the late 1970s.” – Union Of Concerned Scientists
BIAS BY OMISSION
WHAT the “Union Of Concerned Scientists” won’t show you is that there have been similar warming periods of equal magnitude before the era of ‘human emissions’…
THE 2013 UN IPCC report claimed with at least 95 percent certainty that human activities – chiefly the burning of fossil fuels – are the main cause of warming since the 1950s.
“Drafts seen by Reuters of the study by the U.N. panel of experts, due to be published next month, say it is at least 95 percent likely that human activities – chiefly the burning of fossil fuels – are the main cause of warming since the 1950s.”
Experts surer of manmade global warming but local … | Reuters
IDENTICAL WARMING TRENDS
THE 64 thousand dollar questions for IPCC cheerleaders:
- Which side is which time period?
- What caused the warming before CO2 became an issue to be essentially identical to the period when it is claimed to be the main driver?
- How is the IPCC 95% certain one side is caused by man and the other is not?
Read the rest of this entry »