MICHAEL MOORE : ‘Green Energy Is A Scam’
Posted: April 22, 2020 Filed under: Climate Change, Climatism, Energy, Energy Poverty, Fact Check, Failed Green Schemes, Fossil Fuels, Green Energy, green jobs, Green New Deal, Solar, Unreliables, Wind Farms | Tags: Climate Change, Climatism, coal, Green Energy, HELE, hollywood, Michael Moore, Planet Of The Humans, solar, Solar panels, Solar PV, unreliables, Wind Energy, Wind Farms, wind power 3 Comments“The documentary does a good job
at proving that conservatives
were right to say that green energy is a scam“
“This urgent, must-see movie,
a full-frontal assault on our sacred cows,
is guaranteed to generate anger, debate.”
***
A must watch.
IT gets going at around the 13 minute mark, and then, kaboom…
***
UPDATE 26 May
“It was a bright cold day in April,
and the clocks were striking thirteen.”
– 1984
THE Ministry Of Truth has now removed Michael Moore’s original #YouTube release of #PlanetOfTheHumans. It was tracking some 10 million views when shut-down/censored due to a “copyright claim”.
THE complainant, Toby Smith, explains why he is not filled with the obligatory totalitarian streak of the muzzle-ready Leftist …
“I went directly to YouTube rather than approaching the filmmakers because I wasn’t interested in negotiation. I don’t support the documentary, I don’t agree with its message and I don’t like the misleading use of facts in its narrative.”
YOUTUBE boss, @SusanWojcicki agreed and pulled the Moore/Flint docco that thoroughly destroys the “renewable energy” myth.
SUSAN does not trust your judgment or you ability to think for yourself.
Paul Homewood comments, “Regardless of the so-called copyright issues, this is clearly a politically motivated attempt to censor the film, as Toby Smith himself admits.”
*
YOU can find the video here on D.Tube :
https://emb.d.tube/#!/skywalker007/QmPQX6ZNzfnJe7XbjrejNv9rcYr1B19voz4NmFrE9iy8dM
SEE also :
- SCOTLAND’S Net-Zero Forest Management Program | Climatism
- Michael Moore stumbles upon the truth about so-called ‘green’ energy – American Thinker (Climatism post title-tip)
RELATED :
- ‘GREEN’ Energy Future | Climatism
- IF CO2’s Your Poison, Renewable Energy Is No Antidote (Peer-reviewed) | Climatism
- TEAM GRETA Admits Climate Change Has Nothing To Do With The Environment | Climatism
- CADMIUM : The Toxic Problem Of Not-So-Clean Energy | Climatism
- ANGELA MERKEL : The New Climate Change ‘Denier’ | Climatism
- HOW DARE HE! United States Led Entire World In Reducing CO₂ Emissions In 2019 | Climatism
•••
THE Climatism Tip Jar – Support The Fight Against Dangerous, Costly and Unscientific Climate Alarm
(Climate sceptics/rationalists still waitin’ for that “big oil” cheque to arrive in the mail!)
Help us to hit back against the bombardment of climate lies costing our communities, economies and livelihoods far, far too much.
Thanks to all those who have donated. Your support and faith in Climatism is highly motivating and greatly appreciated!
Citizen journalists can’t rely on mastheads, rather private donations and honest content.
Click link for more info…
Many thanks, Jamie.
(NB// The PayPal account linked to “Climatism” is “Five-O-Vintage”)
•••
Loved the Michael Moore video!
LikeLiked by 1 person
I thought the movie was good too, but if i have to offer constructive criticism, it would be that the movie reinforced the notion that global warming due to CO2 emissions is a huge problem. The movie then demonstrated clearly why wind, solar and biomass substitution for fossil fuels are not the answer to this problem (if it really exists), but didn’t say what is the answer – other than dealing with over-population and over-consumption (again, how?). What we now need is a second movie examining the fundamental proposition that we humans are causing global warming, and in case anyone says “the science is settled” for the umpteenth time, that only signals that they don’t understand how science works.
LikeLiked by 1 person
At the present time Nuclear energy is the best high density alternative to fossil fuel energy. Solar and wind energy sound nice but don’t have the density required to replace fossil fuels.
And regardless of what energy source we choose there is an environmental impact; can’t get have energy without entropy!
LikeLiked by 1 person