Advertisements

JORDAN PETERSON On Global Warming : The Clip That Should Be Mandatory Viewing In All Schools!

JORDAN PETERSON - Cambridge - AGW Beatdown - Climatism

Jordan Peterson – Canada’s way of apologizing to the world for Justin Trudeau!


JORDAN PETERSON is a professor at the University of Toronto, a clinical psychologist and the author of the million-plus selling ’12 Rules for Life’, a Number 1 bestseller. He rose to international prominence in 2016, after criticising the Canadian government’s enactment of Bill C-16.

THE psychologist and internet celebrity has been touted as ‘the most influential public intellectual in the Western world right now’, with contentious views on gender, political correctness. A culture warrior, who has no truck with “white privilege”, “cultural appropriation” and a range of other ideas associated with social justice movements.

PROFESSOR Peterson is Canada’s way of apologizing to the world for Justin Trudeau!

*

MUST WATCH clip of on global warming at the Cambridge Union that should be mandatory viewing in all schools!

DOESN’T get much better than this…

CLIP via GWPF

*

H/t @Cartoonsbyjosh

•••

RELATED :

SEE also :

CO2 related :

CO2 ‘Greening The Planet’ related :

TEMPERATURE Related :

ORIGINS Of The Global Warming Scam :

•••

PLEASE Tip The Climatism Jar To HELP Keep The Good Fight Alive!

(Climate sceptics/rationalists still waitin’ for that “big oil” cheque to arrive in the mail!)

Help us to hit back against the bombardment of climate lies costing our communities, economies and livelihoods far, far too much.

Thanks to all those who have donated and continue on a monthly cycle! Your support and faith in Climatism is highly motivating and greatly appreciated!

Citizen journalists can’t rely on mastheads, rather private donations and honest content. Every pledge helps!

Click link for more info…TQ! Jamie.

Donate with PayPal

•••

 

Advertisements

2 Comments on “JORDAN PETERSON On Global Warming : The Clip That Should Be Mandatory Viewing In All Schools!”

  1. chaamjamal says:

    There are a couple of things that Jordan might have said but didn’t.

    1. First, the ocean acidification incident 55 million years ago does not have any relevance to this instance of global warming. Please see
    https://tambonthongchai.com/2018/10/28/petm/

    2. Second, the issue of the uncertainty of the effect of atmospheric co2 on surface temperature is more profound because the reason there is so much uncertainty is that climate sensitivity is derived from a spurious correlation and when that statistical error is corrected, no climate sensitivity remains. In other words the very idea of climate sensitivity derives from bad statistics. It does not really exist. Please see
    https://tambonthongchai.com/2018/09/25/a-test-for-ecs-climate-sensitivity-in-observational-data/

    Like

  2. Jordan Peterson has good intuition. He’s right about a lot of things. Humans being poor at unifying for the common good is one of them, but knowledge of real technological solutions to climate change is not. Nuclear energy is not the huge risk most people think it is. The generalist in us all needs to look at the facts. We need to decide for ourselves. Look at the failure of Germany as Peterson points out to replace nuclear energy with renewable energy. They needed coal plants. The ranking of the relative safety of various energy forms places nuclear plants as the safest and least harmful of all. They actually save lives by replacing coal plants that emit harmful and toxic particles. The nuclear waste issue is also an overblown issue. The amount of waste is tiny compared to the actual energy it creates and electricity it produces. What humans need to do is focus on making the solutions easier to accomplish. For example making new nuclear plants cheaper to build. Over-regulation that has been put in place to satisfy the non-experts from protests is a large part of the costs. How much built in safety do the plants actually need? These kinds of questions are currently being tackled.
    There are also plenty of sources that show the actual death toll from the well known nuclear plant meltdowns being much smaller. In fact Chernobyl is the only plant accident that caused fatalities and they were much, much smaller than many claims..

    Liked by 2 people


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.