SNOWFALL Will Become “A Very Rare And Exciting Event…”
Posted: February 5, 2018 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Alarmist Predictions, Climate Alarmism, Climatism, Dud predictions, Fake News, Global Cooling, Government Grants/Funding, Propaganda, Pseudo-Science, Snow Pack | Tags: auspol, Climate Change, CRU, CSIRO, Dr David Viner, Dud Predictions, Europe, global cooling, Global Warming, IPCC, Moscow, science, snow, UN 2 Comments
Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past – The Independent (Archived PDF)
Snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event.”
“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is.”
Dr David Viner – Senior scientist, climatic research unit (CRU)
*
ONE of the more classic instances of global warming climate change fear-mongering, gone horribly wrong, direct from the mouth of esteemed climatologist Dr David Viner of the UK’s CRU, circa 2000.
THE catastrophic dud-prediction was reported by Charles Onians in the Independent’s most cited (now deleted) article – Snowfalls are now just a thing of the past:
However, the warming is so far manifesting itself more in winters which are less cold than in much hotter summers. According to Dr David Viner, a senior research scientist at the climatic research unit (CRU) of the University of East Anglia,within a few years winter snowfall will become “a very rare and exciting event”.
“Children just aren’t going to know what snow is,” he said.
SINCE Viner’s vapid verbal, Europe and much of the Northern Hemisphere has experienced some of the coldest winters on record, especially over the past five years, with plenty of snow to boot…
2018 RECORD SNOW
MOSCOW saw more than half its average monthly snowfall in the space of 24 hours with 17 inches blanketing the capital by Sunday morning. At least one man was killed, several injured and about 2000 trees collapsed due to the heaviest snowfall in Moscow since the beginning of the weather records, said meteorologists.
WILL the casualties be recorded as human CO2-induced, global warming climate change related? Or, do only “extreme heat” casualties make the cut?
One dead as record snowfall hits Moscow | AFP.com
THE Independent wasn’t alone in its failed snowfall predictions. Our most ‘trusted science’ agencies were parroting the same warmist propaganda…
CLIMATE’S holy body, the UN IPCC predicted diminished snowfalls as human CO2 increased:
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
IPCC – Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change
AUSTRALIA’S ‘premier’ scientific body, the (warmist) CSIRO, jumped on the “end of snow” bandwagon in August 2003:
Simulations of future snow conditions in the Australian alpine regions were prepared for the years 2020 and 2050…
Conclusion:
The low impact scenario for 2020 has a minor impact on snow conditions. Average season lengths are reduced by around five days. Reductions in peak depths are usually less than 10%, but can be larger at lower sites (e.g. Mt Baw Baw and Wellington High Plains).
The high impact scenario for 2020 leads to reductions of 30-40 days in average season lengths. At higher sites such as Mt Hotham, this can represent reductions in season duration of about 25%, but at lower sites such as Mt Baw Baw the reduction can be more significant (up to 60%)…
We have very high confidence (at least 95%) that the low impact scenarios will be exceeded and the high impact scenarios will not be exceeded.
https://www.climatechange.vic.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0015/73212/TheImpactofClimateChangeonSnowConditions2003.pdf (Page Not Found – LOL!)
2014, the New York Times signalled “The End of Snow”:
The End of Snow? – NYTimes.com
*
AND yet, climate realists (sceptics) are still smeared and slimed as the climate “deniers”. Rather telling when one considers the real-world evidence at hand.
•••
Related :
- AMID a Warming Planet, Snow Falls in Southern Morocco – First Time in 50 Years! | Climatism
- THE “Blizzard Of Oz” That Wasn’t Meant To Be | Climatism
- EXTREME WEATHER Expert: “World Is Presently In An Era Of Unusually Low Weather Disasters” | Climatism
- The Great “Extreme Weather” Climate Change Propaganda Con | Climatism
- Understanding The “Hottest Year Evah” | Climatism
- TOP 10 Climate Change Lies Exposed | Climatism
- SCIENTISTS : Worst Climate Warnings ‘Will Not Come True’ | Climatism
- THE Inconvenient Truth Is That Catastrophists Are Wrong | Climatism
- Record Breaking Winter Cold? Don’t Worry, the Climate Explainers Have it Covered | Climatism
- Snowfall on Alaska mountains has doubled – climate change blamed | Climatism
- David Viner’s Thing Of The Past Comes Back To Haunt Him (Again!) | Climatism
See also :
- CLIMATE CHANGE – The Most Massive Scientific Fraud In Human History | Climatism
- “In Searching For A New Enemy To Unite Us, We Came Up With The Threat Of Global Warming” | Climatism
- Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History | Climatism
- EXTREME WEATHER Propaganda – The Pathway To Global Warming Hysteria | Climatism
- NASA “Sea Level Rise” Fraud | Climatism
- Understanding The “Hottest Year Evah” | Climatism
THE Fantasy Of Accelerating Sea Level Rise Just Got Hosed
Posted: February 5, 2018 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Alarmism uncovered, Carbon Dioxide, Climate models, Empirical Evidence, Failed Climate Models, Government Grants/Funding, Satellite Data, Sea Level Rise | Tags: climate, Climate Change, CO2, failed climate models, Global Warming, science, sea level rise Leave a comment“Using these modelled estimates, the globe should now be seeing a rapid acceleration in sea level rise. Yet no evidence of this can be found so far. In fact the real measured data show the opposite is happening: a deceleration in sea level rise is taking place.”
“In other words: global sea level rise has decelerated since the 1950s.”
NUFF said!
We’ve been told over an over again that global warming would melt the icecaps, and melt Greenland, and that would result in catastrophic sea level rise flooding cities. We’ve also been told that “sea level rise is “accelerating” but in an investigation done here on WUWT by Willis Eschenbach, Putting the Brakes on Acceleration, he noted in 2011 that there seems to be no evidence of it at all, and notes that sea level was rising faster in the first half of the record.
Figure 1. Satellite-measured sea level rise. Errors shown are 95% confidence intervals. Data Source.
The smaller trend of the recent half of the record is statistically different from the larger trend of the first half. Will this reduction continue into the future? Who knows? I’m just talking about the past, and pointing out that we sure haven’t seen any sign of the threatened acceleration…
View original post 541 more words
Recent Comments