More on the Bombshell David Rose Article: Instability in the Global Historical Climate NetworkPosted: February 8, 2017
“Thomas Karl and Thomas Petersen both retired from NOAA in the last two years, so they didn’t fear any retribution.”
There has been a visceral reaction by the defenders of the climate faith to the Mail on Sunday article by David Rose…
…where the Karl et al. 2015 “pausebuster” was not just called into question by a NOAA whistleblower, who saus procedures weren’t followed, and that the authors “played fast and loose” with the figure, but basically called fraudulent on the face of it becuase it appears to have been done for political gain. In my opinion The lead authors, Thomas Karl and Thomas Petersen both retired from NOAA in the last two years, so they didn’t fear any retribution.
Having met both of these people, and seen their zealotry, none of the shenanigans brought out by the David Rose article surprised me.
The faithful have been claiming that there’s no difference between the NOAA and HadCRUT temperature datasets depicted in the Rose article, saying it’s a baseline error that…
View original post 826 more words