We have a winner!
Straight to the top of the “Your SUV controls everything list”!
By Paul Homewood
h/t Dave Nunn/Dave Ward
The BBC gave up any pretence of accuracy or objectivity in its reporting of climate change many years ago.
But this grossly dishonest piece of propaganda is breathtaking even by their standards.
Storms in December 2015 linked to climate change caused more than £3.5m worth of damage to cricket clubs in the UK, says a report.
Two clubs, Sowerby Bridge in West Yorkshire and Appleby Eden in Cumbria, have yet to return to their grounds.
And 130-year-old Corbridge Cricket Club had to have their clubhouse demolished as a result of Storm Desmond.
The England and Wales Cricket Board distributed more than £1m in emergency funding to clubs last year.
And the ECB has also earmarked £1.6m for 2017.
The “Weather Warning” report, which comes from the Climate Coalition, is backed by more than 100 organisations including the WWF-UK, the RSPB, the National…
View original post 102 more words
The current political world, climate, reality in a 3 minute nutshell ….
By Andrew Bolt ~
Paul Kelly is furious that voters are fed up with the political class and demand change.
He lashes out, attacking scapegoats as he confuses cause and effect:
The conservative side of Australian politics is now devouring itself, consumed by personal aggrandisement, ideological delusion and populist fervour in an upheaval likely to destroy the Turnbull government, deliver power to the Labor Party and generate a structural split among conservatives that will weaken their cause for years to come.
The grandest hoax of our time, pumped out daily by conservative media outlets, is that the present Donald Trump-inspired turbulence will make conservatism in Australia ever stronger. In truth, conservatism in this country is being trashed. Every principle and value of genuine conservatism is being ripped up in an orgy of indulgent self-interest that exposes the intellectual and moral weakness of conservatism in Australia and its abject corruption by…
View original post 796 more words
“Thomas Karl and Thomas Petersen both retired from NOAA in the last two years, so they didn’t fear any retribution.”
There has been a visceral reaction by the defenders of the climate faith to the Mail on Sunday article by David Rose…
…where the Karl et al. 2015 “pausebuster” was not just called into question by a NOAA whistleblower, who saus procedures weren’t followed, and that the authors “played fast and loose” with the figure, but basically called fraudulent on the face of it becuase it appears to have been done for political gain. In my opinion The lead authors, Thomas Karl and Thomas Petersen both retired from NOAA in the last two years, so they didn’t fear any retribution.
Having met both of these people, and seen their zealotry, none of the shenanigans brought out by the David Rose article surprised me.
The faithful have been claiming that there’s no difference between the NOAA and HadCRUT temperature datasets depicted in the Rose article, saying it’s a baseline error that…
View original post 826 more words