Advertisements

Australian PM argues the case for coal power 

“Can politicians put sanity ahead of ideology for Australian electricity generation following recent blackout fiascos?”

Without being negative of a naysayer, Turnbull is simply appealing to his conservative base who have deserted him in droves for holding a zealot-like belief in man-made “Global Warming” (CAGW). Turnbull has always been a staunch advocate of an emissions trading scheme/scam to “tackle climate change”. And he signed a midnight deal to include Australia in the Paris climate fraud.

Once a (Lefty) zealot, always a zealot.

Don’t believe the hype.

Tallbloke's Talkshop

Dumper truck symbol = coal production [click on image to enlarge] Dumper truck symbol = coal production [click on image to enlarge] Can politicians put sanity ahead of ideology for Australian electricity generation following recent blackout fiascos?

The Australian Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull has reinforced his belief in the importance of coal as a pragmatic part of the global energy mix, reports PEI. The Australian online reports Turnbull as saying he had the same opinion while leader of the opposition in 2009.

“We are the biggest coal exporter in the world. If anybody — if any country — has a vested interest in demonstrating that clean coal and cleaner coal with new technologies can make a big contribution to our energy mix — and, at the same time, reduce our emissions in net terms — it’s us.”

“Our approach, and my approach, to energy is absolutely pragmatic and practical. This is not a matter for ideology.” Mr Turnbull said…

View original post 121 more words

Advertisements

Economic Disaster Looms: The £300 Billion Cost of Britain’s Wind Power Debacle

“…outsourced our carbon emissions to developing countries such as China. Described by the PM’s special adviser as ‘an act of self harm’, our climate change policies are harming our standard of living, our jobs and our industry.”

They talk about the “social cost of carbon”. Well, the above paragraph explains absolutely the “social cost” rendered when the climate obsessed West imposes draconian climate policy on itself in a suicidal attempt to appease the fanatical environmental lobby, in a useless effort to fix a mythical non-problem – “Global Warming” now called “Climate Change”, as the planet hasn’t warmed, at all, for the past 18+ years, despite record CO2 emissions over the same period.

The West is being brought to its knees and slowly destroyed by a pseudo-scientific Leftist Trojan horse going by the eco-friendly name of “Saving The Planet”.

You have been warned…multiple times.

STOP THESE THINGS

theresa may May she see sense before it’s all too late?

***

Britain set itself on the path to wind powered penury a decade ago and sealed its fate with its Climate Change Act in 2008.

As anyone with a modicum of common sense could have predicted, the result have been a social and economic disaster, the costs of which can only escalate from here.

In this report from the Global Warming Policy Foundation, the financial cost alone is tipped to hit £300 Billion, outstripping the cost of every other major piece of infrastructure policy currently on foot in Britain.

Report reveals £300 Billion cost of Britain’s Climate Change Act
Global Warming Policy Foundation
11 December 2016

A new report published today (PDF 518KB) by the Global Warming Policy Foundation reveals the extraordinary £319 billion cost of Britain’s Climate Change Act.

The report, which is based entirely on official figures, exposes the mischievous…

View original post 535 more words


NASA and Climate Dogma

“The first two papers are by John Cook, founder of the notorious Skeptical Science website.”

NASA citing the fake-science and debunked “97%” garbage of cartoonist and climate activist John Cook! Says it all really about the veracity and objectivity of climate “science” over there at NASA, run by fellow activist Gavin Schmidt.

Science Matters

Recently in a confirmation hearing Senator Harris of California claimed that according to NASA, 97% or more of actively published climate scientists agree that climate warning trends over the past century are extremely likely due to human activities. Then she suggested no one should doubt this finding.

Going to NASA’s page on this topic, you can see clearly that NASA scientists did no such research. In fact, the citations are to only five studies done by people with little or no background in atmospheric physics and research.

The first two papers are by John Cook, founder of the notorious Skeptical Science website.

John Cook has an undergraduate education in physics from the University of Queensland and a post-graduate honors year studying solar physics, worked as a self-employed cartoonist before founding a website pushing climate alarmism. For this he was given the title of the Climate Communication Fellow for the Global Change…

View original post 618 more words