Continued Hype and Deceit Drive Climate, Energy Agenda – Clobbering Poor Families
Posted: October 18, 2016 Filed under: Alarmism Debunked, Carbon Dioxide, Eco-Activists, Extreme Weather, Fact Check, Government Grants/Funding, Govt Climate Agenda, Green Agenda, Hurricanes | Tags: Alarmism, Alarmism debunked, Climate Policy, Driessen, Energy Poverty, Global Warming Agenda, Hurricanes, Matthew Leave a comment“No Real-World evidence supports a “dangerous manmade climate change” thesis. In fact, a moderately warmer planet with more atmospheric carbon dioxide would hugely benefit crop, forest and other plant growth, wildlife and humans – with no or minimal climate effect. A colder planet with less CO2 would punish them. And a chillier CO2-deprived planet with less reliable, less affordable energy (from massive wind, solar and biofuel projects) would threaten habitats, species, nutrition and the poorest among us.”
Such a simple yet overwhelmingly critical paragraph that eviscerates the supposed “global warming planetary crisis”.
As is this:
“It is clearly not climate change that threatens the poor. It is policies imposed in the name of preventing climate change that imperil poor, minority, blue-collar, farm and factory families.”
Read more of Paul Driessen’s common sense and reasoned argument that is so painfully devoid in the alarmist, schizophrenic world of “Climate Crisis Inc.”
Hurricane Matthew has given climate change alarmists yet another excuse to rail against fossil use and demand a “fundamental transformation” of the US and world energy and economic systems. Reality simply does not support their claims or demands.
Guest opinion by Paul Driessen
Despite constant claims to the contrary, the issue is not whether greenhouse gas emissions affect Earth’s climate. The questions are whether those emissions are overwhelming the powerful natural forcesthat have always driven climate fluctuations, and whether humans are causing dangerous climate change.
No Real-World evidence supports a “dangerous manmade climate change” thesis. In fact, a moderately warmer planet with more atmospheric carbon dioxide would hugely benefit crop, forest and other plant growth, wildlife and humans – with no or minimal climate effect. A colder planet with less CO2 would punish them. And a chillier CO2-deprived planet with less reliable, less affordable energy (from massive wind, solar…
View original post 1,211 more words
Leaked Clinton campaign memo on ‘climate change’ shows it’s really about politics, not science
Posted: October 18, 2016 Filed under: Uncategorized 1 Comment“Masters of Disasters” Fabiani and Lehane confirm that issues of environmental catastrophe play into quite a number of the Lefts/Progressives social agendas, namely power and control.
The UN and its environmental agencies, UNEP and their ‘sciencey’ arm, the IPCC, have used Global Warning aka Climate Change to push their globalist agenda for decades:
“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.“ – Timothy Wirth, President of the UN Foundation
“Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the
industrialized civilizations collapse?
Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about?” – Maurice Strong, founder of the UN Environment Programme (UNEP)More recently this stunning admission from IPCC leader, Ottmar Edenhoffer, in November 2010 :
“We (UN IPCC) redistribute de facto the world’s wealth by climate policy…”
“One has to free oneself from the illusion that international climate policy is environmental policy. This has almost nothing to do with the environmental policy anymore…”And this from Christiana Figueres, executive secretary of the UN’s Framework on Climate Change in 2014 :
“This is the first time in the history of mankind that we are setting ourselves the task of intentionally, within a defined period of time, to change the economic development model that has been reigning for at least 150 years since the Industrial Revolution.”
In other words, use climate policy (through climate alarmism) to change the structure of the worlds successful free-market capitalist economies to the failed statist communist model.
Nice one Wikileaks and the Podesta emails – the gift that keeps on giving!
From Larry Kummer at the Fabius Maximus website
Memorandum: “Climate: A unifying theory to the case“,
Emailed from John Podesta to Chris Lehane, 28 January 2014.
This memo was emailed to Podesta (a senior White House official) from Lehane (partner in the strategic communications firm Fabiani & Lehane, dissolved in Nov 2015). We have it courtesy of Wikileaks — and whoever leaked it to them.
John Podesta was Chief of staff to Bill Clinton and Counselor to the President for Obama. He is Chairman of Hillary Clinton’s campaign.
Chris Lehane – When an attorney in the White House Counsel’s office, he and his current business partner Mark Fabiani called themselves the “Masters of Disaster” for their work as a “rapid-response” team responding to the many scandals of the Clinton Administration. Lehane co-authored a book on damage control titled Masters of Disaster: The Ten Commandments of Damage Control
View original post 1,172 more words
Recent Comments