The UN IPCC didn’t like the Medieval Warm Period so they simply rewrote temperature history to suit their political agenda https://climatism.wordpress.com/2013/11/27/shock-news-un-ipcc-rewrote-temperature-history-to-suit-their-political-agenda/
By Andrew Bolt ~
Four years ago an Australian study by warmist scientists, including Melbourne University’s Joelle Gergis, created breathless headlines:
The Guardian: “Australasia has hottest 60 years in a millennium, scientists find”;
The Age and The Australian led with “Warming since 1950 ‘unprecedented’.
The story was on ABC 24 and ABC news where Gergis proclaimed:” there are no other warm periods in the last 1000 years that match the warming experienced in Australasia since 1950.”
Jo Nova describes what followed:
Gergis used 300,000 dollars and took three years to produce a flawed paper. Bloggers corrected Gergis’ mistake for free in three weeks. Peer review had missed it completely in the first place, then took four years to get it right.
Four years of work later – so long! – Gergis tries again, and produces a different and less alarming picture of Australia’s temperature record to virtually no media…
View original post 378 more words