The ‘regime shift’ between 1920/30’s ‘global warming’ and recent ‘global warming’ is perfectly highlighted in this example.
The shift being that 1920/30’s warming was 100% natural, versus recent warming that is insisted upon as being 100% CO2 man-made.
One only has to analyse government climate funding that is solely (100%) directed to the study of man-made climate change. Don’t bother applying for climate funding unless you premise your study with “Anthropogenic”, “climate change”,”global warming” or perhaps “global weirding”
What an ungrateful, self-loathing bunch of sanctimonious eco-hypocrites we have become.
By Paul Homewood
The warming of the Arctic in the 1920s and 30s is well documented, despite attempts to wipe it from the temperature record. But it is always good to come across another paper, even though this one dates back to 2006.
During the 1920s and 1930s, there was a dramatic warming of the northern North Atlantic Ocean. Warmer-than-normal sea temperatures, reduced sea ice conditions and enhanced Atlantic inflow in northern regions continued through to the 1950s and 1960s, with the timing of the decline to colder temperatures varying with location. Ecosystem changes associated with the warm period included a general northward movement of fish. Boreal species of fish such as cod, haddock and herring expanded farther north while colder-water species such as capelin and polar cod retreated northward. The maximum recorded movement involved cod, which spread approximately 1200 km northward along West Greenland. Migration patterns of…
View original post 1,650 more words