The Profiteers of climate doomPosted: February 11, 2016
The most important and ‘inconvenient’ question in the climate debate, IMHO…
5: Why is the gap widening between warming rates measured by satellite and by surface datasets?
Equally, why the divergence between surface and satellites combined, to IPCC CMIP5 (overheated) models? Climate models that single handedly drive the trillion dollar “climate change” industry ?
Ten killer questions that expose how wrong and ideologically driven they are
by Christopher Monckton of Brenchley, Willie Soon and David R. Legates
A century or so from now, based on current trends, today’s concentration of carbon dioxide in the air will have doubled. How much warming will that cause? The official prediction, 1.5-4.5 degrees Celsius (2.7-8.1 degrees Fahrenheit) per doubling of CO2, is proving a substantial exaggeration.
Professor William Happer of Princeton, one of the world’s foremost physicists, says computer models of climate rely on the assumption that CO2’s direct warming effect is about a factor of two higher than what is actually happening in the real world. This is due to incorrect representations of the microphysical interactions of CO2 molecules with other infrared photons.
As if that were not bad enough, the official story is that feedbacks triggered by direct warming roughly triple the warming, causing not 1…
View original post 1,612 more words