NASA Sea Level Fraud
Posted: December 6, 2015 Filed under: Cherry Picking, Climate Fraud, Climate science, COP21, Fact Check, Gavin Schmidt, Government Grants/Funding, Govt Climate Agenda, Green Agenda, Pseudo-Science, Satellite Data, Scientific Fraud, Sea Level Rise | Tags: climate fraud, COP21, Data Fraud, Data Tampering, Gavin Schmidt, nasa, Scientific Fraud, sea level rise, Sea Level Rise Scam 2 CommentsWhen measuring the temperature of the atmosphere, NASA and the climate crisis industry refuse to acknowledge the much more comprehensive and accurate satellite data sets, UAH and RSS, as both show no global warming at all over the past 20 years. Instead they opt for the UHI effected and massively tampered with, GISStemp land-based data set.
Yet to measure sea-level rise, they are more than happy to use satellite data, over (land-based) tidal gauge data, when a glitch in the system fits their warming bias.
Shameless cherry picking and the biggest wilful scientific scandal in history.
Real Science
NASA shows 3.24 mm/year sea level rise on their web site. They call it “Facts” – when in fact it is blatant fraud.
Climate Change: Vital Signs of the Planet: Sea Level
Until early December 2015, NOAA had this web page up showing about half that much sea level rise. NOAA just made it disappear ahead of COP 21.
the absolute global sea level rise is believed to be 1.7-1.8 millimeters/year.
Sea Level Trends – Global Regional Trends
Here is the web archive link from September 10, 2015
September 10, 2015 : Sea Level Trends – Global Regional Trends
So let’s look at how NASA committed their fraud. The first thing they did was to add in a 0.3 mm/year “Global Isostatic Adjustment” (GIA) to their satellite data. This is a completely fraudulent adjustment based on theoretical sea floor sinking – which should be used to calculate the sea floor height…
View original post 319 more words
I have written about the fact that any Arctic ice melt and resulting sea level rise, if any exists, is a direct result cloud cover caused by of aviation emissions over the arctic. Greenland’s ice is black as a result. If it really were a problem aviation would be referenced and it is not.
LikeLike
“The glittering, icy landscape of Greenland is being marred by soot that falls from the smoke plumes of Arctic wildfires, new satellite-based research shows. That soot darkens the surface of the ice and makes it absorb more sunlight, hastening its melt.”
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article/arctic-wildfire-soot-dark/
That said Arctic sea ice levels have rebounded in recent years and are the same as 2007 levels.
Whilst Greenland is currently receiving abundant ice mass coverage.
LikeLike