More Smoking Guns Of Fraud At NASA

“Pathological Science” (NASA, NOAA)

Via Pointman :

There are many aspects to the style of science underpinning the theory of global warming that remind me of something the American scientist Irving Langmuir christened pathological science. Wiki for once is accurate and defines it as –
“Pathological science is a psychological process in which a scientist, originally conforming to the scientific method, unconsciously veers from that method, and begins a pathological process of wishful data interpretation.”
It goes on to say it has the following characteristics –

* The maximum effect that is observed is produced by a causative agent of barely detectable intensity, and the magnitude of the effect is substantially independent of the intensity of the cause.
* The effect is of a magnitude that remains close to the limit of detectability, or many measurements are necessary because of the very low statistical significance of the results.
* There are claims of great accuracy.
* Fantastic theories contrary to experience are suggested.
* Criticisms are met by ad hoc excuses.
* The ratio of supporters to critics rises and then falls gradually to oblivion.

Real Science

In 1923, the whole world was rapidly warming and glaciers were disappearing. It was reported that “Iceland is no longer … the land of ice


04 May 1923 – WINTERS ARE WARMER. Why the World’s Climate is C…

NASA (AKA The Ministry of Truth) does not show this warming prior to 1923.

Fig.A2 (1)

This pre-1923 warming was clearly shown in the 1975 National Academy of Sciences graph, as was the cooling after the 1883 eruption of Krakatoa – which NASA has also erased.

ScreenHunter_10729 Oct. 09 22.55

In 1976, National Geographic showed the same pre-1923 warm up, and had a discussion of the 1883 Krakatoa cooling.


They also photographically documented the retreat of glaciers before 1940.

ScreenHunter_3436 Oct. 09 23.38

ScreenHunter_3435 Oct. 09 23.38

Until a few years ago, NASA showed the 1920’s warm up in Iceland, and temperature maximum around 1940.


But that didn’t fit the needs of the criminals in the White House, so NASA simply made the earlier…

View original post 28 more words

2 Comments on “More Smoking Guns Of Fraud At NASA”

  1. What is so incredible, is that the fraud is so blatant, yet not one word from all those supposed “scientists” whose reputation is being dragged through the dirt by the fraudsters.

    I can only assume that this fraudulent behaviour is now so endemic in academia that no one sees anything wrong with it.

    Liked by 1 person

    • Climatism says:

      Who dares question the “experts”, especially the esteemed folk over at NASA?
      NASA & and NOAA et al play the ‘authority’ card to a tee, to the demise of science and discovery.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.