“Who controls the past controls the future; who controls the present controls the past.”
These are indeed, Orwellian times we live in.
By Andrew Bolt ~
Jennifer Marohasy cannot understand why it’s a scandal to want to check the figures of the Australian Bureau of Meteorology:
For the true believer, it is too awful to even consider that the Australian Bureau of Meteorology could be exaggerating global warming by adjusting figures. This doesn’t mean, though, that it’s not true.
In fact, under prime minister Tony Abbott, a panel of eminent statisticians was formed to investigate these claims detailed in The Australian newspaper in August and September last year.
The panel did acknowledge in its first report that the bureau homogenised the temperature data: that it adjusted figures. The same report also concluded it was unclear whether these adjustments resulted in an overall increase or decrease in the warming trend.
No conclusions could be drawn because the panel did not work through a single example of homogenisation, not even for Rutherglen. Rutherglen…
View original post 399 more words
Among satellites which study Earth’s temperature, 100% of them agree that Earth is not warming.
By contrast, 100% of climate models are wrong.
So how do climate experts respond to this? They ignore the best data we have from satellites, and rely on completely worthless climate models.
The Need To Revisit The Climategate Revelations To Counter Mainstream Media Failure And The Paris Climate Conference PlansPosted: September 29, 2015
Welcome to Climategate …
“Remember all the fun we had last year over 1995 global temperatures, with early release of information (via Oz), “inventing” the December monthly value, letters to Nature etc etc? I think we should have a cunning plan about what to do this year, simply to avoid a lot of wasted time.” “We feed this selectively to Nick Nuttall (Executive Director of UNEP) (who has had this in the past and seems now to expect special treatment) so that he can write an article for the silly season. We could also give this to Neville Nicholls (IPCC lead author and Australian Met Bureau employee.)??”
Guest opinion: Dr. Tim Ball
It is time to revisit the emails leaked from the Climatic Research Unit (CRU) at East Anglia. The first 1000 emails were released in November 2009 just prior to the Climate Conference of the Parties (COP) 15 scheduled for Copenhagen. They effectively stopped political plans for a replacement of the Kyoto Protocol, a massive redistribution of wealth designed as part of Agenda 21. You can read what the UN says about this plan developed under the auspices of Maurice Strong as head of the United Nations Environment Progam (UNEP) or read Glenn Becks interpretation of the implications.
Here is a sampling:
We need to remind people of the revelations to undermine the completely unnecessary and unjustified plans scheduled for the upcoming Paris Climate Conference (COP21). The person who released the emails is now apparently safe from prosecution because…
View original post 2,001 more words
U N B E L I E V A B L E.
Though 110% understandable when you have a global warming agenda to prosecute.
And then they name-call anyone sceptical of this data manipulation, as “deniers” of science !?
Wilsons Promonotory is the southernmost point in Victoria. Satellites show that there has been no warming there since the start of records in 1978.
As of 2012, GISS showed no warming since the start of records in 1880.
But since 2012, Gavin and Tom have added a spectacular hockey stick of post 1978 (satellite era) warming.
The animation below shows their spectacularly fraudulent manipulations of the surface temperature data at Wilson’s Promontory.
This warming does not exist. The fraudsters at NASA and NOAA simply made it up.
Since Abbott’s knifing, and the appointment of warmist Turnbull, the UN has ‘opened a door’ for Australia at ‘high-level (warmist) talks’ in Paris.
More Australian taxpayers hard-earned money siphoned off to the UN, to fix a non-problem. Not to mention our rights to be signed away on the dotted line.
Will we get our money and freedoms back if the atmosphere stays in hiatus for another 18.9 years?
Guest essay by Eric Worrall
The Guardian reports that Australia’s new climate alarmist Prime Minister Malcolm Turnbull, has not renewed outspoken skeptic Maurice Newman’s appointment as head of the Prime Ministers Business Advisory Council.
According to The Guardian;
… Former prime minister Tony Abbott appointed Newman as one of his first acts after winning government in 2013.
Newman has used a weekly column in the Australian to expound private views on climate change, including that the world was ill-prepared for a period of global cooling and that the United Nations was using debunked climate science to impose a new world order under its own control.
He also called for a government-funded review of the Bureau of Meteorology (BoM) to “dispel suspicions of a warming bias” in its temperature record-keeping, something freedom of information documents have recently revealed was under consideration…
View original post 162 more words
MASIE Proves Yearly Arctic Ice Recovering
You will be hearing a lot about 2015 having the fourth lowest minimum Arctic ice extent ever recorded.
Here is what they are not telling you:
MASIE has very helpfully provided their records for the last ten years. Since stormy weather can affect both maximum and minimum ice extents, emphasis on March and September averages can be misleading. From a climate change perspective, a better metric is the average ice extent over the entire year. By that measure we gain a realistic perspective on the last ten years of Arctic ice fluctuation.
While Arctic ice varies a lot seasonally, the graph shows that it is not that variable annually during this decade. Fluctuating about +/- 4%, there was a slightly increasing trend, particularly in the last five years. Here are the ice extents in M km2:
|Year||Annual Average||March Average||Sept Average||Sept Minimum||March Max|
View original post 235 more words
And they want to jail people who question, or are ‘sceptical’ of whacko claims like this, and not the other way around?
We live in truly bizarre and dangerous times.
National Geographic published this spectacularly fraudulent hockey of sea level, along with this wildly false claim.
Local measurements of sea level with tide gauges became common after 1880; satellites began global measurements in 1992. They’ve shown a clear acceleration: At an eighth of an inch a year, sea level is rising twice as fast as it was a few decades ago.
NOAA says that sea level rise rates are one half of the fake National Geographic claims.
absolute global sea level rise is believed to be 1.7-1.8 millimeters/year
This hockey stick is exactly inverted from the real data. Sea level rise has slowed tremendously over the last seven thousand years.
And their claim of recent acceleration is wildly false. Many gauges show no sea level rise, or sea level falling. Few, if any show acceleration (upwards curvature)…
View original post 45 more words