Climate experts tell us that the US is experiencing a near unprecedented drought, when in fact it is the exact opposite. US drought coverage is near historic lows.
Compare vs. 80 years ago
Excellent PMD historical drought comparison via Steven Goddard (Real Science):
Guest essay by Robert Moore
Is it true that we are in the worst drought in California history? Let’s look at the facts for the last 120 years (1895 to present).
As shown in this chart from the Western Regional Climate Center website (http://www.wrcc.dri.edu) — this is not even the 2nd driest water year for California in the last 120 years.
The driest year was 1924 (9.23 inches, or 40% of normal). The current water year (October 2013 through September 2014) ranks as the 3rd driest in the last 120 years (at 52% of normal).
As for the claim that this is the worst multi-year drought in California history – look at the period of 1910-40 on the WRCC chart. Wow… that was really a dry 30 year period.
View original post 65 more words
Dr. Tim Ball must read via WUWT :
“Ten years ago I simply parroted what the IPCC told us. One day I started checking the facts and data – first I started with a sense of doubt but then I became outraged when I discovered that much of what the IPCC and the media were telling us was sheer nonsense and was not even supported by any scientific facts and measurements. To this day I still feel shame that as a scientist I made presentations of their science without first checking it.”
“There’s nothing we can do to stop it (climate change). Scientifically, it is sheer absurdity to think we can get a nice climate by turning a CO2 adjustment knob.”
Skeptics have done a reasonable job of explaining what and how the IPCC created bad climate science. Now, as more people understand what the skeptics are saying, the question that most skeptics have not, or do not want to address is being asked – why? What is the motive behind corrupting science to such an extent? Some skeptics seem to believe it is just poor quality scientists, who don’t understand physics, but that doesn’t explain the amount, and obviously deliberate nature, of what has been presented to the public. What motive would you give, when asked?
The first step in understanding, is knowledge about how easily large-scale deceptions are achieved. Here is an explanation from one of the best proponents in history.
View original post 1,859 more words
A new look at the Wind Industry
ex-OSA staffmember works to reform the subject of Scientology
Exegesis Hermeneutics Flux Capacitor of Truthiness
for those who dream of metaphysical crepes
Politische Beiträge und philosophische Essays
FOR 4.5Bn YEARS CLIMATE & TEMPERATURE HAVE CHANGED Without MANKIND'S INPUT! - Driven by The SUN, PLATE TECTONICS & VOLCANIC ACTION but NOT MANKIND
Conservative Christian and Political Opinion Site. exposing corruption in the church and politics.
The Truth Never Dies
Welcome to an expanding worldview
bildende Künstlerin in Baden bei Wien
Wind Turbine Locations, Maps, Lawsuits, Setbacks
unlimited interests - #Love #Earth #community
Organic Gardening tips
Opinions and analysis of everything under the sun.
ICT Marketing & IT Security in Australia