There is No Global Warming and Will Be None for Decades
Posted: February 14, 2014 Filed under: Carbon Dioxide, Climate, Climate Change, Climatism, Empirical Evidence, Fact Check, Failed Climate Models, Global Cooling, Global Temperature, Global Warming Stasis, Satellite Data, Solar | Tags: global cooling, ice age, Little Ice Age, Low Solar Activity 3 Comments“We’ve got to ride this global warming issue.
Even if the theory of global warming is wrong,
we will be doing the right thing in terms of
economic and environmental policy.“
– Timothy Wirth,
President of the UN Foundation
“No matter if the science of global warming is all phony…
climate change provides the greatest opportunity to
bring about justice and equality in the world.”
– Christine Stewart,
former Canadian Minister of the Environment
Global temperatures plummeting over the past decade – Weatherbell
•••
via Canada Free Press
Monday, February 10, 2014
Alan Caruba
I recently received an unsigned email about my Sierra Club commentary in which I pointed out that it opposes traditional forms of energy and made a passing reference to Obama’s lie that “climate change”, the new name for global warming, was now “settled science.”
The writer of the email disagreed with me. “lol you are a f**king idiot. you don’t believe there is global warming going on? you need to let your prejudices go and stop basing your views on what your political stance is…do you research you f**king faggot.”
Global warming was never based on real science. It was conjured up using dubious computer models and we were supposed to believe that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change could actually predict what the climate would be twenty, fifty, or a hundred years from now.
Now, not everyone who believes in global warming is as rude as this individual and certainly not as ignorant, but his message suggests that those who do not believe in it do so as the result of “a political stance” when, in fact, our views are based on science.
A small army of scientists lined their pockets with government grants to produce data that supported the utterly baseless charge that carbon dioxide was causing the Earth to warm. They castigated other scientists or people like myself as “deniers” while we proffered to call ourselves sceptics. They were joined by most of the media that ignored the real science. And the curriculums in our schools were likewise corrupted with the hoax.
Anyone familiar with my writings knows that a lot of research is involved. In my case, it dates back to the late 1980s when the global warming hoax began to be embraced by politicians like Al Gore who made millions selling worthless “carbon credits” while warning that “Earth has a fever.”
Then, about 17 years ago the Earth began to cool. It had nothing to do with carbon dioxide — which the Environmental Protection Agency deems a “pollutant” despite the fact that all life on Earth would die without it — and everything to do with the SUN.
A few days after the email arrived, two-thirds of the contiguous U.S.A. was covered by snow. As this is being written, Lake Superior is 92% frozen, setting a new record. As of February 5, the entire Great Lakes system was, according to the Great Lakes Environmental Research Laboratory, 77% covered with ice.
On February 1st, NOAA and NASA held a joint press conference in which they released data about 2013’s global surface temperature. They made reference to a “pause” in the temperature that began in 1997. Dr. David Whitehouse, science editor for the BBC, noted that “When asked for an explanation for the ‘pause’ by reporters, Dr. Gavin Schmidt of NASA and
Dr. Thomas Karl of NOAA spoke of contributions from volcanoes, pollution, a quiet Sun, and natural variability. In other words, they don’t know.”
Both of these government agencies, along with others like the EPA and the Department of the Interior are staffed by people who understand that their employers are deeply committed to the global warming hoax. One should assume that almost anything they have to say about the “pause” is based entirely on politics, not science.
Then, too, despite the many measuring stations from which data is extracted to determine the Earth’s climate, there is a paucity of such stations in COLD places like Siberia. Stations here in the U.S. are often placed in “heat islands” otherwise known as cities. If you put enough of them close to sources of heat, you get thermometer readings that produce, well, heat.
Full article here »
* Climatism Great Lakes ice extent graphic added . Climatism links added.
See also : Climate Scientists 95% Sure The Science Is Unsettled | CACA
•••
Related :
- The Great Global Warming Climate Shift | CACA
- To The Horror Of Global Warming Alarmists, Global Cooling Is Here – Forbes
- Global Cooling – Why Humans Don’t Have Much To Do With Climate Change | Lawrence Solomon
- Solar activity heads for lowest low in four centuries – environment – 01 November 2013 – New Scientist
- Over two-thirds of the contiguous USA covered with snow | CACA
- IPCC In Complete Denial That The Sun Is Causing Global Cooling | CACA
- Polar Vortex Theory – Basic Physics For Climate Morons | Real Science
- NATURE STUDY Confirms Global Warming Stopped 15 Years Ago | CACA
- Establishing Propaganda Is Vital For Climate Action | CACA
- When Hell Freezes Over | CACA
- Global Warming Is The Greatest And Most Successful Pseudoscientific Fraud In History | CACA
- Tracking Global Cooling | CACA
Alarmists are almost all of left wing thinking.
On top of that, when they are contradicted, they jump to insanity – a proof that they do not respect those thinking differently:
This is a totalitarist behaviour resulting from their ideology and history. Nothing to do to change them.
LikeLike
Can’t fault you there.
On that, climate alarmists tend to default to authority and a higher power without specifying hard evidence, which is a sure sign of groupthink mentality. Never helpful in a science discussion, as the individual under the spell of the ‘group’, would not have been reasoned into a position, therefore can never be reasoned out. And if that subsequent ‘belief’ system is threatened, they will protect it at all costs, even if that means throwing abuse, smear and ad-hominem. Which is usually the case 97% of the time.
The essence of a scientific theory is that it can be refuted. ‘Global Warming’ can be refuted with facts i.e. the past 17 year warming standstill. If a theory can’t be refuted, it becomes a religion.
The new name ‘Climate Change’ cannot be refuted, because the climate always changes, and hot or cold can be used as evidence, therefore the theory is unfalsifiable, therefore it is a religion.
LikeLike
[…] “We’ve got to ride this global warming issue. Even if the theory of global warming is wrong, we will be doing the right thing in terms of economic and environmental policy.“ – Timothy Wirth, Presid… […]
LikeLike