Understanding Peer Review
Posted: January 23, 2014 Filed under: Alarmism uncovered, Alarmist Godfathers, Alarmists, Climate Fraud, Climate science, Climategate, Data Tampering, Eco-Activists, Environmentalism, Environmentalists, Government Grants/Funding, Govt Climate Agenda, Green Agenda, Hockey Stick, Pal-Review, Propaganda, Pseudo-Science | Tags: Climategate, CRU, East Anglia University, Mann-Made Global Warming, Phil Jones, trenberth Leave a commentCLIMATEGATE Related :
- ‘Global warming is the greatest and most successful pseudoscientific fraud I have seen in my long life’ | CACA
- Climate change: this is the worst scientific scandal of our generation – Telegraph
- MUST READ : Climate change emails between scientists reveal flaws in peer review | Fred Pearce
- The Climategate Chronicle: How the Science of Global Warming Was Compromised – SPIEGEL ONLINE
- IPCC Researchers Admit Global Warming Fraud – The New American
- Climategate 3.0: FOIA – The Man Who Saved The World – Telegraph Blogs
- The CRU Mails
- Tom Nelson: 50+ Michael Mann ClimateGate emails
- Climategate U-turn as scientist at centre of row admits: There has been no global warming since 1995 | Mail Online
- But I thought the ‘science was settled’ | Las Vegas Review-Journal
From: Phil Jones <p.jones@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
To: “Michael E. Mann” <mann@xxxxxxxxx.xxx>
Subject: HIGHLY CONFIDENTIAL
Date: Thu Jul 8 16:30:16 2004I can’t see either of these papers being in the next IPCC report. Kevin and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what the peer-review literature is !
Cheers
Phil
Recent Comments